Files
hassio-addons/.github/scripts
Alexandre a04d818479 fix(ci): stop tier 1 wasting its turn budget; escalate max-turns after one retry (#2951)
* fix(ci): stop tier 1 wasting its turn budget; escalate max-turns after one retry

Now that classification actually runs, the 12-turn budget got its first real
exercise — and #2949 died on it. The budget was never the problem; how it was
spent was. Turn-by-turn from that run: 3 turns retrying Bash (not in
allowedTools, and failing against the bubblewrap sandbox that
allowed_non_write_users switches on), 6 hunting .templates/ha_entrypoint.sh and
ha_automodules.sh which are not in the sparse checkout, leaving 3 for the issue.

Fixed at the cause rather than by raising the cap, which stays at 12:

* .templates is now checked out. Most add-ons are thin wrappers around those
  shared scripts, so a large share of reports can only be explained by reading
  them — this makes triage more accurate, not merely faster. 184K, 25 files.
  It has to be added in TWO places: ai_triage_context.sh calls
  `git sparse-checkout set`, which REPLACES the list, so omitting it there
  would silently undo the workflow's checkout at exactly the wrong moment.

* The prompt now states the environment up front: three tools, no Bash, and
  precisely which paths exist on disk. The model cannot discover these cheaply
  — every probe costs a turn it then does not have for the analysis.

Separately, a max-turns death is NOT a workflow fault, but GATE 1 treated every
action failure as systemic and never escalated. So #2949 failed red, stayed
unlabelled, and the catch-up re-dispatched it daily forever — taking the first
of only five slots each time, since it sorts newest-first. It is now handled
like GATE 2: one retry, then ai:needs-human. Detected from the action's
execution_file, which is written even on failure. Warning rather than error,
because a red run per day for a per-issue condition is alarm fatigue, and the
outcome is recorded durably on the issue itself.

The two escalation sites are now one shared function, so they cannot drift.

Re-tested all 15 paths: max-turns across the three events, genuine action
failure with and without an execution file, and the full existing sweep.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(ci): make the max-turns probe fail closed on an unexpected file shape

Copilot: hit_max_turns scanned with `.[]?` and no root-type check. jq's `.[]?`
iterates the VALUES of an object, so if the action ever changed the execution
file's shape, {"result":{"subtype":"error_max_turns"}} would have matched —
downgrading a genuine workflow failure from a red run to a warning. That is the
silent-failure class this workflow exists to remove, arriving through the door
I had just built.

Reproduced: with the old filter that object matched; with `(type == "array")`
prepended it does not. Anything that is not the array we expect now falls
through to the loud path.

Verified: the real array shape is still detected and still escalates on the
second look; object-root, nested-object and non-JSON execution files all exit 1
red instead of being swallowed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(ci): fail loudly when escalation doesn't land; don't escalate a manual first look

Two CodeRabbit findings, both reproduced before accepting.

1. escalate_to_human suppressed `gh issue edit` with `|| true`, so it returned
   success even when ai:needs-human never landed. Both callers then exited 0
   reporting a hand-off that had not happened — and, having no label, the issue
   went straight back into the retry rotation the escalation existed to remove.
   The edit now propagates its status and callers exit 1 with an explicit error.
   `gh label create` stays best effort; the edit fails on its own if the label
   is genuinely missing. Verified that removing a label an issue does not carry
   is a no-op, so this cannot fail spuriously.

2. EVENT_NAME was doing duty as an attempt counter, but workflow_dispatch is
   BOTH the daily catch-up retry and the maintainer's manual re-triage — so a
   hand-dispatched FIRST attempt was escalated immediately.

   Rather than the suggested explicit retry state, the two are already
   distinguishable: the catch-up dispatches with GITHUB_TOKEN and arrives as
   github-actions[bot], a manual run as the maintainer. Confirmed against run
   metadata (catch-up 2026-08-10 = github-actions[bot]; manual 2026-07-27 =
   alexbelgium). is_automated_retry() keys on both, which makes "one retry then
   a human" literally true without new persistent state: a manual attempt that
   fails leaves the issue unlabelled, so the catch-up still gets its go.

Re-tested 15 paths including a stubbed `gh` failure at the escalation site.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(ci): raise max-turns to 25; no max-turns path may end in a silent green run

Three changes, one requested and two from an independent Codex review.

* --max-turns 12 -> 25, per the maintainer's updated call. The prompt preamble
  and comments were carrying the old number and are updated with it. The
  upfront optimisation stays: the earlier waste was 3 turns retrying an
  unavailable Bash and 6 hunting files outside the sparse checkout, and a
  bigger budget should buy analysis rather than more of that.

* Codex objected that the max-turns branch reintroduced the very failure class
  this workflow exists to prevent. It was right. On the SECOND look the outcome
  is durable (ai:needs-human), but on a FIRST attempt nothing was recorded
  anywhere except an annotation, so exiting 0 was a green run over triage that
  silently did not happen. Now the only exit 0 is the one where the escalation
  label actually landed; every other max-turns path is red. My "alarm fatigue"
  argument was overstated: escalation ends the rotation, so this costs at most
  one red run per problem issue, not one per day.

* Codex also flagged inferring the retry from github.actor as brittle — a
  re-run, a PAT- or App-issued dispatch, or a different maintainer all change
  it, and the false NEGATIVE (an automated retry never recognised as one, so it
  retries forever) is the dangerous direction. Replaced with an explicit
  `source` dispatch input that only the catch-up sets. Unknown provenance is
  now safe by construction because that path ends red rather than green.

Re-tested: max-turns across first look / manual dispatch / catch-up retry /
catch-up-with-failing-label / issue_comment, plus the full existing sweep.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(ci): correct two triage comments the recent logic changes left stale

Comments only — no behaviour change, confirmed by diffing out comment lines
(nothing else moved) and re-running the behavioural suite to identical results.

* The prompt preamble still said "the turn budget is 12" and computed
  "leaving 3 for the actual issue" off it. The budget is 25 now. Reworded to
  keep the #2949 evidence, which is still true as history (3 turns retrying
  Bash, 6 hunting files outside the sparse checkout), while stating the
  current budget and why it is not licence to probe more.

* GATE 2 still said "A workflow_dispatch is the catch-up or a manual
  re-triage, i.e. the second look". That stopped being true when escalation
  moved to is_automated_retry(): only source=catchup counts as the second
  attempt, and a manual dispatch is a first look that deliberately does not
  escalate, leaving the issue unlabelled so the catch-up still gets its go.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 12:55:32 +02:00
..